关于奥普雷诺 13 Pro 5G 的结论雷诺（Reno）是美国的一个赌博小镇，意大利语是莱茵河的意思，也是奥普（Oppo）公司推出的一个高品质智能手机系列，奥普雷诺 13 Pro 5G 的推出使该系列达到了新的高度：这款手机在很多方面都能赶上更昂贵的手机，目前在网上的售价仅为 600 欧元（约合 690 美元）。
虽然与前代产品相比，雷诺 13 Pro 的价格有所上涨，但其配置仍然很高：主要是因为它采用了轻质、高品质和防水的金属外壳，拥有快速的 Wi-Fi、良好的摄像系统和足够大的内存。此外，还承诺 6 年安全更新。
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
不过，高端智能手机的某些功能您还是得放弃：例如，这里没有潜望镜变焦摄像头，不能通过 USB 端口输出图像，显示屏的亮度也不如顶级手机。在负载情况下，雷诺 13 Pro 的发热量也很高。在这个价格区间，已经有一款搭载骁龙 8 精英处理器的 Poco F7 Ultra，它的性能明显更强。
如果你正在寻找一款物美价廉的智能手机，并且不需要顶级性能，那么选择 OPPO 雷诺 13 Pro 5G 几乎不会有错。
Pros+ 纤薄、轻巧、时尚
+ 防水
+ 电池寿命长
+ 三个清晰的 5000 万像素摄像头
+ 价格合理
+ 稳定快速的无线局域网
+ 操作流畅
+ 均衡的扬声器音效高达
+ 高达 80 瓦的快速充电
+ 承诺 6 年更新Cons- 内存相对较慢
- 没有潜望镜变焦摄像头
- 高端没有 SoC
- 负载情况下机箱发热严重
- PWM 闪烁
- 只有 USB 2.0
价格和供应情况Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G 在欧洲和亚洲广泛销售。但在北美，你很难找到这款产品。
Ibywind for Oppo Reno13 Pro 5G Screen Protector,2-Pack,Hydrogel Film with Camera Lens Protector,Easy Installation Tool,Bubble-Free,Fingerprint Unlock Compatible,Anti-Shatter,Anti-ScratchGANGANPRO 1 Pack Privacy Screen Protector Compatible with OPPO Reno13 Pro 5G,HD Black 9H Hardness,Coverage Anti Spy Private Tempered Glass,Support Fingerprint UnlockingGANGANPRO 2 Pack Privacy Screen Protector Compatible with OPPO Reno13 Pro 5G,HD Black 9H Hardness,Coverage Anti Spy Private Tempered Glass,Support Fingerprint Unlocking
Table of Contents关于奥普雷诺 13 Pro 5G 的结论规格外壳和功能 - 您需要的一切都在这里通信和操作 - 快速无线局域网软件与可持续发展 - Oppo 6 年来的更新换代摄像头 - 双面 5000 万像素显示屏 - 明亮的 AMOLED性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 速度不快，但续航时间长Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
规格
Oppo Reno13 Pro (Reno13 Series)ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 8350 3.4 GHz, 4 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A715, 4 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A510, Cortex-A15 / A510Graphics adapterARM Mali-G615 MP6Memory12 GB Display6.83 inch 19.8:9, 2800 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla glass 7i, 240Hz sampling rate, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB , 495 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 162.8 x 76.6Battery5800 mAh Lithium-Ion, 80 Watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.8, phase comparison-AF, contrast-AF, OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 2); 8.0MP, f/2.2, contrast-AF, wide angle lens (Camera 3)Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0, phase comparison-AF, Videos @2160p/60fps Additional featuresSpeakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69-certified, eSIM support, fanless, waterproofWeight195 g
Price799 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳和功能 - 您需要的一切都在这里尽管拥有 6.83 英寸的超大屏幕，Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G 却只比竞争对手大几毫米。此外，尽管它配备了大容量电池，但机身更纤薄，重量也更轻，仅为 195 克。
机身握感非常舒适，看起来也很有质感。石墨灰是我们测试设备的颜色，非常经典。如果您喜欢更醒目的颜色，还可以选择翎紫色。做工质量很高。
由于采用了大猩猩 7i 玻璃，屏幕可以很好地抵御撞击；由于通过了 IP68/IP69 认证，手机掉进水里也不用担心。
512 GB 大容量存储空间和 12 GB 内存是该价位手机的标准配置。手机支持 eSIM 卡和 nano-SIM 卡，还配备了 NFC 和用作遥控器的红外触发器。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Realme GT 6 Oppo Reno13 Pro Xiaomi 15 Pro OnePlus 13R Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra DIN A6 ❌
通信和操作 - 快速无线局域网智能手机支持 WiFi 6，但无法选择使用频率较低的 6 GHz 网络。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，该设备的传输速率超过了 1,500 MBit/s。幸运的是，传输也非常稳定。
蜂窝调制解调器支持 5G 这一最快的标准，并提供多种频率。这确保了 Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G 在旅行时也能用于访问移动互联网。
由于采用了 240 Hz 采样率和高达 120 帧/秒的帧频，触摸屏对输入的响应速度非常快。即使是轻微的动作，也足以在流畅的系统中进行导航。
手机可以通过面部识别或指纹传感器解锁。后者位于屏幕后方，能快速可靠地识别我们的指纹，不过解锁时需要稍稍等待一段时间。面部识别也能完美地工作，但由于是二维识别，所以不太可靠。
NetworkingOppo Reno13 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
996 (min: 916) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1428 (min: 1331) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼60%
Xiaomi 15 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 13RWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼30%
Realme GT 6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼57%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
699 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
722 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1290 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼90%
Oppo Reno13 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø996 (916-1123) Oppo Reno13 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1428 (1331-1529)
软件与可持续发展 - Oppo 6 年来的更新换代该系统基于Android 15，Oppo 重叠了其 ColorOS 15，提供了一个非常简洁流畅的系统。制造商承诺更新至 2031 年，即从测试开始算起的 6 年内。
包装是无塑料的，但没有关于产品可持续性的进一步信息。
摄像头 - 双面 5000 万像素前置摄像头样张OPPO 希望通过其相机系统与更昂贵的手机竞争，因此在背面安装了两个 5000 万像素的摄像头：一个主摄像头和一个长焦摄像头，这样就可以实现混合变焦。
主摄像头表现出色，可拍摄出清晰的植物或其他全景图像。在弱光环境下，清晰度和动态范围仍保持在较高水平。视频最高可录制 60 帧/秒的 4K，图像质量也非常好，自动对焦几乎难以察觉。
广角摄像头的分辨率仅为 800 万像素。它能拍摄出合格的照片，但几乎看不到小细节。
自拍摄像头的分辨率也达到了 5000 万像素，拍照效果不错。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cam - flowersMain cam - outdoorsMain cam - low lightWide angle camclick to load imagesOppo Reno 13 ProApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Reno 13 ProApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Reno 13 ProApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Reno 13 ProApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
4.1 ∆E7.8 ∆E6.3 ∆E4.4 ∆E8.8 ∆E6.6 ∆E8.3 ∆E5.9 ∆E9.6 ∆E6.3 ∆E5.3 ∆E5.7 ∆E6.6 ∆E1.4 ∆E11 ∆E1.6 ∆E7.3 ∆E2.6 ∆E4.7 ∆E5.2 ∆E5.3 ∆E3.4 ∆E8.7 ∆E11 ∆EColorChecker Oppo Reno13 Pro: 6.16 ∆E min: 1.42 - max: 11.05 ∆E24.4 ∆E26.8 ∆E27.9 ∆E26.8 ∆E31.4 ∆E33.1 ∆E29.3 ∆E22.7 ∆E18.5 ∆E23.9 ∆E30.3 ∆E35.1 ∆E22.7 ∆E27.1 ∆E13.6 ∆E25.5 ∆E26.2 ∆E28.9 ∆E28 ∆E24.3 ∆E28.9 ∆E29.1 ∆E22.2 ∆E12.8 ∆EColorChecker Oppo Reno13 Pro: 25.82 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 35.11 ∆E
Oppo Reno13 ProOppo Reno13 Pro
显示屏 - 明亮的 AMOLED子像素记录在开启亮度传感器的情况下，Oppo 雷诺 13 Pro 5G 的屏幕在日常使用中可达到 987 cd/m² 的峰值亮度。一些竞争对手的屏幕亮度更高一些，而 小米 Poco F7 Ultra则完全不同。不过，Oppo 雷诺 13 Pro 的 AMOLED 显示屏可以轻松满足日常使用需求，即使是在户外明亮的日子里也是如此。
在低亮度下，我们测得的闪烁频率约为 93 Hz，因此敏感人群在购买前应先试用一下屏幕。
如果选择 "Pro "作为色彩设置，各个色调的显示会相当准确，而且不会出现偏蓝现象。
924cd/m²976cd/m²936cd/m²968cd/m²987cd/m²969cd/m²920cd/m²968cd/m²978cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 987 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 958.4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %Center on Battery: 987 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.25 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.26CCT: 6688 K
Oppo Reno13 ProAMOLED, 2800x1272, 6.8"Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraFlow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"Xiaomi 15 ProAMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"OnePlus 13RAMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"Realme GT 6AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"Screen34%6%23%27%Brightness middle (cd/m²)9871846 87%1016 3%1213 23%975 -1%Brightness (cd/m²)9581850 93%1017 6%1206 26%974 2%Brightness Distribution (%)9393 0%98 5%97 4%98 5%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.251.2 4%1.15 8%1 20%0.8 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.342.9 13%3.57 -7%2.3 31%1.4 58%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.42.3 4%1.9 21%1.6 33%0.9 62%Gamma2.26 97%2.25 98%2.2 100%2.22 99%2.22 99%CCT6688 97%6707 97%6677 97%6546 99%6467 101%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 93 HzAmplitude: 12 %The display backlight flickers at 93 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 93 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8039 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
最低亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise↘ 0.9 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise↘ 1.1 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 速度不快，但续航时间长采用 联发科 Dimensity 8350处理器，而不是高端 SoC，制造商选择了一款刚刚跻身上流社会的处理器。在日常使用中，你可以期待一个流畅的系统。即使是要求稍高的任务，也能快速完成。不过，如果你想要真正的高端动力，还是竞争对手更适合你。
UFS 3.1 内存与同价位手机相比速度较慢。
外壳上的热量积聚实际上非常明显：我们在长时间负载后测得的温度高达 51.1 °C。在多次运行基准测试后，SoC 也会出现明显的节流现象，有时只能提供原来一半甚至三分之一的电量。
底部边缘的扬声器得到听筒的支持，两者合在一起可以发出相当大的声音。声音均衡而饱满。如果再次以最大音量按下音量键，"超大音量模式 "将被激活，这将使智能手机在嘈杂的环境中更加清晰可闻。不过，在该模式下，高音尤其会被增强，在安静的环境中声音会变得难听。
手机有多种音频编解码器，可以通过蓝牙轻松连接耳机或扬声器。
Oppo 安装了一块容量为 5,800 mAh 的电池。这意味着，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款手机的续航时间超过 23 小时，足够正常使用至少两天。手机充电功率可达 80 瓦，最多一小时即可充满电。
Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2 | Geekbench AI Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3089 Points +131%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2959 Points +121%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2309 Points +73%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2214 Points +66%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1898 Points +42%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=209, last 2 years)
1768 Points +32%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (1225 - 1457, n=5)
1341 Points 0%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1337 Points Multi-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9404 Points +138%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8711 Points +121%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8154 Points +107%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6605 Points +67%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=209, last 2 years)
5163 Points +31%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4879 Points +24%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (3947 - 4616, n=5)
4225 Points +7%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
3947 Points Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2189 Points +110%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1647 Points +58%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1498 Points +44%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=112, last 2 years)
1231 Points +18%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1043 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (1026 - 1043, n=2)
1035 Points -1% Multi-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7570 Points +88%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5474 Points +36%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=112, last 2 years)
4242 Points +5%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4036 Points Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4012 Points -1%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (3635 - 4036, n=2)
3836 Points -5%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19622 Points +98%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
19083 Points +93%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18231 Points +84%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (9907 - 19261, n=4)
16144 Points +63%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=180, last 2 years)
14854 Points +50%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13085 Points +32%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
9907 Points 3DMark
Wild Life ExtremeXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6567 Points +124%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5907 Points +101%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4891 Points +67%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2983 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8140, n=195, last 2 years)
2972 Points +1%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
2936 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (2649 - 3110, n=5)
2874 Points -2% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6521 Points +119%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6036 Points +103%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4854 Points +63%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
2973 Points Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8102, n=194, last 2 years)
2948 Points -1%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2907 Points -2%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (2594 - 3060, n=5)
2875 Points -3% Solar Bay Unlimited ScoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11589 Points +134%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11553 Points +133%Average of class Smartphone (1151 - 15420, n=87, last 2 years)
9219 Points +86%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8364 Points +69%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4948 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4613 - 4948, n=3)
4836 Points -2%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4813 Points -3% Solar Bay ScoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11654 Points +148%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11251 Points +140%Average of class Smartphone (3223 - 14869, n=87, last 2 years)
9235 Points +97%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8398 Points +79%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4692 - 5058, n=3)
4829 Points +3%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4692 Points Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4686 Points 0%GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
120 fps +100%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
120 fps +100%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (51 - 102, n=5)
73.6 fps +23%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
60 fps 0%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
60 fps OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
60 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)
59.4 fps -1%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
276 fps +124%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
248 fps +102%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
223 fps +81%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
185 fps +50%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (116 - 141, n=5)
124.6 fps +1%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
123 fps Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 367, n=206, last 2 years)
118.8 fps -3%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
106 fps +80%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
88 fps +49%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
60 fps +2%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
59 fps Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
55 fps -7%Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (33 - 65, n=5)
52 fps -12%Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
47.9 fps -19%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
112 fps +129%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
94 fps +92%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
88 fps +80%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
49 fps Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (45 - 53, n=5)
49 fps 0%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
46 fps -6%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 146, n=206, last 2 years)
45.6 fps -7%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
48 fps +118%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43 fps +95%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
41 fps +86%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
22 fps Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (20 - 24, n=5)
21.8 fps -1%Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 62, n=207, last 2 years)
21.1 fps -4%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
21 fps -5%Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
94853 Points +117%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
84676 Points +94%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=190, last 2 years)
49590 Points +14%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
43632 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (38258 - 49086, n=4)
43048 Points -1%OnePlus 13RQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
41734 Points -4%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
30234 Points -31%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1131 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (1106 - 1131, n=3)
1116 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=70, last 2 years)
738 Points -35% Half Precision NPU 1.5Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4488 - 4555, n=3)
4513 Points +1%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4488 Points Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=70, last 2 years)
3005 Points -33% Quantized NPU 1.5Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4546 - 4549, n=3)
4547 Points 0%Oppo Reno13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4546 Points Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=70, last 2 years)
4418 Points -3%
Oppo Reno13 ProXiaomi Poco F7 UltraXiaomi 15 ProOnePlus 13RRealme GT 6Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-561%83%71%50%-4%8% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)20084002.68 99%3998.65 99%3987.44 99%3452.12 72%1874 ?(1023 - 2110, n=36) -7%2184 ?(270 - 4370, n=192, last 2 years) 9% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)16373464.43 112%3673.38 124%3201.32 96%3211.78 96%1338 ?(575 - 2028, n=36) -18%1865 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=192, last 2 years) 14% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)237311.24 31%409.67 73%374.54 58%315.76 33%290 ?(208 - 386, n=36) 22%295 ?(47.6 - 576, n=192, last 2 years) 24% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)411411.78 0%555.55 35%542.13 32%397.65 -3%357 ?(64.8 - 745, n=36) -13%343 ?(9.4 - 987, n=192, last 2 years) -17%
Max. LoadIdle
50 °C46.7 °C44.7 °C 50.8 °C45.7 °C41.8 °C 51.1 °C45.5 °C41.7 °C
Maximum: 51.1 °CAverage: 46.4 °C
41.2 °C45.5 °C44.7 °C43.1 °C44.4 °C48.2 °C40.6 °C44.2 °C47.7 °C
Maximum: 48.2 °CAverage: 44.4 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
28.2 °C7.9 °C27.7 °C 28.2 °C27.9 °C27.9 °C 27.9 °C27.7 °C27.8 °C
Maximum: 28.2 °CAverage: 25.7 °C
28 °C27.8 °C28 °C27.9 °C27.7 °C27.6 °C28 °C27.8 °C27.6 °C
Maximum: 28 °CAverage: 27.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 37.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.3 % +35%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.6 % +16%Oppo Reno13 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55.8 % Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.4 % -3%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.4 % -29% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestXiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.8 % +42%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.1 % +32%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.7 % +1%Oppo Reno13 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.2 % OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.5 % -30% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 % +152%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
74.5 % +124%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % +54%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35.1 % +5%Oppo Reno13 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33.3 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % +17%Xiaomi Poco F7 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.8 % +8%OnePlus 13RAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.6 % +8%Oppo Reno13 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.5 % Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 % -23%
Oppo Reno13 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.2 (9.01-16.9) Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15 (9.85-18.3) Oppo Reno13 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.1 (32.5-58.2) Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49 (37.2-68.4) Oppo Reno13 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø15.7 (5.44-16.3) Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28 (24.9-33.4) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.7 (8.51-16.6) Oppo Reno13 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø8.01 (5.77-8.82) Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1) OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.01 (4.04-8.03)
热图 - 正面
热图 - 背面
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Oppo Reno13 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Realme GT 6 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
23h 18min
Oppo Reno13 Pro5800 mAhXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra5300 mAhXiaomi 15 Pro6100 mAhOnePlus 13R6000 mAhRealme GT 65500 mAhBattery runtime-21%3%9%-17%WiFi v1.3 (h)23.318.4 -21%24.1 3%25.3 9%19.3 -17%Reader / Idle (h)51.638.331.3H.264 (h)37.140.528.7Load (h)4.43.53.3
Notebookcheck 总体评分Oppo 雷诺 13 Pro 5G 评测Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G 是一款高品质智能手机，电池续航时间长，价格公道。
不过，您需要牺牲一些顶级功能和性能。
Back to the verdict
Oppo Reno13 Pro
- 06/22/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Chassis89%
Keyboard65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device91%
Connectivity46 / 69 → 67%
Weight89%
Battery93%
Display90%
Games Performance27 / 55 → 48%
Application Performance61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance60%
Temperature81%
Noise100%
Audio73 / 90 → 81%
Camera79%
Average63%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials10%Packaging75%Power Use50%Repairability7%Software Updates91.7% Total Sustainability Score: 38.9%
可能的替代品比较
Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!
More articles related to this deviceOppo Reno13 Pro (Reno13 Series)News•关于 Oppo Reno 13 Pro 的评论：可能对Galaxy S25 Ultra 和其他产品构成威胁
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1397 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009contact me via: @FloSchmi26, LinkedIn, XingTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 703249 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: